<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Article Tag Suite 1.3//EN" "https://jats.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/1.3/JATS-journalpublishing1-3.dtd">
<article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"
         xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"
         article-type="research-article" xml:lang="English" dtd-version="1.3">
  <front>
    <journal-meta>
      <journal-title-group><journal-title>International Journal of Oncology Research</journal-title></journal-title-group>
      
      <publisher><publisher-name>IORO Publications</publisher-name></publisher>
    </journal-meta>
    <article-meta>
      <article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.64823/ijor.2601003</article-id>
      <article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">857360290901</article-id>
      <title-group><article-title>Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma and its Treatment Strategies</article-title></title-group>
      <contrib-group>
    <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes">
      <name><surname>Akram</surname><given-names>Muhammad</given-names></name>
      <aff>University of Management and Technology</aff>
    </contrib>
      </contrib-group>
      <pub-date pub-type="epub"><year>2026</year><month>09</month><day>28</day></pub-date>
      
      <issue>1</issue>
      <fpage>47</fpage>
      <lpage>56</lpage>
      <abstract><p>Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is one of the lethal malignancies due to the complex biology, genetic factors, over - expression of multiple biomarkers leading to multiple signaling pathways, immersed nature of tumor, lessen survival incidence from surgical resection and delayed diagnosis. The conventional treatment methods with less efficacy include chemotherapy and combinational therapy of gemcitabine with other chemotherapeutic drugs. These are some factors which demands advanced therapeutic regimens which includes oral drug which can stop progression at early stages. To address this concern, different drugs have been identified through virtual screening and experimented in-vivo and in-vitro that showed effective treatment outcomes. Capecitabine combination with different drugs has shown promising results in case of combinational therapies usage against PDAC. Advanced treatment strategies includes immunotherapy, use of monoclonal antibodies, immune checkpoint inhibitors, cancer vaccines, personalized medicine and nanotechnology based drug delivery system (DDS) which opens doors for rapid and promising results to alleviate progression of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. Drug delivery through nanotechnology based drug delivery system (DDS) has been showing effective anti-tumor results to stop the progression of cancer at advanced stage of PDAC. Overall, this review suggested that advanced technologies could serve as a robust way to treat this solid malignancy as well as development of drugs (oral / effective chemotherapeutic drug) can stop this disease at early as well as at advanced stages.</p></abstract>
      <kwd-group kwd-group-type="author-generated"><kwd>PDAC</kwd><kwd>Gemcitabine</kwd><kwd>Capecitabine</kwd><kwd>Immunotherapy</kwd><kwd>Nanotechnology- based drug delivery system (DDS)</kwd></kwd-group>
    </article-meta>
  </front>
  <body>
    <sec>
      <p>Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma and its Treatment Strategies</p>
    <p>Aiman Yaseen1, Muhammad Akram1, *</p>
    <p>1Department of Life Sciences, School of Science, University of Management and Technology, Lahore, 54770, Pakistan</p>
    <p>*Corresponding Author: </p>
    <p>Introduction </p>
    <p>Drug discovery and development through different technologies and strategies has addressed multiple diseases such as Alzheimer’s disease, Parkinson’s disease, many viral diseases and multiple types of cancers such as prostate cancer, ovarian cancer, breast cancer, lung cancer, pancreatic cancer and many more. This review aims to discuss the biology and treatment strategies for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma.</p>
    <p>Physiology of Pancreas</p>
    <p>This is an organ present behind the stomach surrounded by other organs. It has a major role in digestion, comprises of enzymes like amylase, trypsin and lipase. It is made up of two glands endocrine and exocrine glands. </p>
    <p>Literature Review </p>
    <p>Proteins over-expresses during PDAC</p>
    <p>There are multiple novel tumor specific proteins, genes or antigens which are crucial for the point of view of therapeutic applications in PDAC. Here in this review, a few proteins are being discussed, their function, importance in the progression of PDAC. </p>
    <p>Leukemia Inhibitory Factor (LIF)</p>
    <p>Nima –related protein kinase -7 (NEK-7) </p>
    <p>Phosphoprotein Phosphatases family (PPPs) </p>
    <p>Kallikrein –related protein -8 (KLK8)</p>
    <p>KLK8 is also an important protein which over-expresses during PDAC. Over-expression of this protein cleaves epidermal growth factor (EGF), then binds to epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) and start multiple signaling pathways associated with the progression of PDAC. </p>
    <p>Treatment Availability of PDAC</p>
    <p>Non- oncology Drugs for PDAC </p>
    <p>Figure 2. Microenvironment of Pancreas</p>
    <p>Drugs obtained through Virtual Screening</p>
    <p>Chemotherapy</p>
    <p>Surgical Treatment </p>
    <p>Combinational Therapies</p>
    <p>Immunotherapy </p>
    <p>An advanced type of cancer treatment is immunotherapy. Tumor microenvironment (TME) consists of different types of cell populations, which include dendritic cells, (CAFs) cancer associated fibroblasts, epithelial cells, T-regulatory cells, tumor associated macrophages (TAM), and B-lymphocytes. They show intrinsic resistance to conventional treatment that is use of chemotherapeutic drugs. Several types of immunotherapies reported such as use of monoclonal antibodies, immune checkpoint inhibitors, adoptive cell transfer and vaccination.</p>
    <p>Nanotechnology based drug delivery system (DDS)</p>
    <p>Personalized Medicines</p>
    <p>There are some limited regarding the treatment strategies of PDAC. Prior, only gemcitabine was used. Some other combinations were also used but there are some limitations in using these drugs as combinational therapies. Some non-oncology drugs, in-silico identified drugs are also available but they lack in-vivo and in-vitro experimentations for proper validation to be used as a treatment against PDAC. Personalized medicines have some limitations too. They will target specific mutation or specific biomarkers. It means huge amount of funds are required for designing medicines for other mutations or genes which are leading towards PDAC. Advanced treatment such as nanotechnology based drug delivery system (DDS) has outperformed conventional treatment in clinical trials. But it also require further research to develop formulations that target every specific mutation. This requires a lot of research to explore the unidentified and unexplored areas.</p>
    <p>Conclusion</p>
    <p>Progress in the treatment of PDAC is ongoing and survival rate has been increased from 5% to 9% from the last few years. Since 1996, the treatment against PDAC has started and emerging day by day that will improve the outcome of the disease to overcome it. But gemcitabine and combination of different drugs has not shown survival benefit. Combination use of monoclonal antibodies and immune checkpoint inhibitors have shown proven results yet. Still, there is an urgent need to develop strategies that would discover specific and sensitive biomarkers for rapid identification. There is a need to conduct more pre-clinical and clinical studies to explore the efficacy of different treatments. Advanced treatments such as immunotherapy, personalized medicines and nanotechnology based drug delivery system has revolutionized the field of drug development and discovery that will target the specific genes and receptors, ultimately stop the signaling pathways and hence alleviate disease progression. There is a need to collaborate with different oncologist, pharmacists, radiologist and surgeons to design the accurate patients’ classification for proper treatment at proper time. Research is needed to further explore the best treatment in the recent years to combat this lethality.</p>
    <p>Funding: This study did not receive any funding in any form.</p>
    <p>Acknowledgments: This study conducted and supported by the Department of Life Science, University of Management and Technology, Lahore, Pakistan.</p>
    <p>Conflicts of Interest: The authors declare no conflict of interest</p>
    <p>References</p>
    <p>J. D. Mizrahi, R. Surana, J. W. Valle, and R. T. Shroff, “Pancreatic cancer,” The Lancet, vol. 395, no. 10242. Elsevier Ltd, pp. 2008–2020, 2020.</p>
    <p>L. Rahib, M. R. Wehner, L. M. Matrisian, and K. T. Nead, “Estimated Projection of US Cancer Incidence and Death to 2040,” JAMA Netw. Open, vol. 4, no. 4, pp. 1–14, 2021.</p>
    <p>M. Moore, “Activity of gemcitabine in patients with advanced pancreatic carcinoma: A review,” Cancer, vol. 78, no. 3 SUPPL., pp. 633–638, 1996.</p>
    <p>T. Conroy et al., “FOLFIRINOX versus gemcitabine for metastatic pancreatic cancer,” N. Engl. J. Med., vol. 364, no. 19, pp. 1817–1825, 2011.</p>
    <p>M. Amrutkar and I. P. Gladhaug, “Pancreatic cancer chemoresistance to gemcitabine,” Cancers (Basel)., vol. 9, no. 11, p. 157, 2017.</p>
    <p>P. Rawla, T. Sunkara, and V. Gaduputi, “Epidemiology of pancreatic cancer: global trends, etiology and risk factors,” World J. Oncol., vol. 10, no. 1, p. 10, 2019.</p>
    <p>P. Maisonneuve and A. B. Lowenfels, “Epidemiology of pancreatic cancer: An update,” Dig. Dis., vol. 28, no. 4–5, pp. 645–656, 2010.</p>
    <p>R. Wijnen et al., “Cyclin dependent kinase-1 (CDK-1) inhibition as a novel therapeutic strategy against pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC),” Cancers (Basel)., vol. 13, no. 17, p. 4389, 2021.</p>
    <p>Y. Zhang et al., “Novel agents for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: emerging therapeutics and future directions,” J. Hematol. Oncol., vol. 11, pp. 1–17, 2018.</p>
    <p>R. Haider, “Penicillin and the Antibiotics Revolution Global History,” Asian J. Pharm. Res., vol. 13, no. 1, pp. 55–62, 2023.</p>
    <p>R. A. Copeland, “Chance Favors the Perplexed Mind: The Critical Role of Mechanistic Biochemistry in Drug Discovery,” Biochemistry, vol. 60, no. 29, pp. 2275–2284, 2021.</p>
    <p>S. Surabhi and B. K. Singh, “Computer aided drug design: an overview,” J. Drug Deliv. Ther., vol. 8, no. 5, pp. 504–509, 2018.</p>
    <p>C. Finan et al., “The druggable genome and support for target identification and validation in drug development,” Sci. Transl. Med., vol. 9, no. 383, p. eaag1166, 2017.</p>
    <p>A. Nishimoto, “Effective combinations of anti-cancer and targeted drugs for pancreatic cancer treatment,” World J. Gastroenterol., vol. 28, no. 28, p. 3637, 2022.</p>
    <p>Y. Shi et al., “Targeting LIF-mediated paracrine interaction for pancreatic cancer therapy and monitoring,” Nature, vol. 569, no. 7754, pp. 131–135, 2019.</p>
    <p>J. E. Lefler et al., “STAT3 in tumor fibroblasts promotes an immunosuppressive microenvironment in pancreatic cancer,” Life Sci. alliance, vol. 5, no. 11, 2022.</p>
    <p>E. Wrona, P. Potemski, F. Sclafani, and M. Borowiec, “Leukemia inhibitory factor: a potential biomarker and therapeutic target in pancreatic cancer,” Arch. Immunol. Ther. Exp. (Warsz)., vol. 69, pp. 1–8, 2021.</p>
    <p>J. Xu, L. Lu, and L. Li, “NEK7: a novel promising therapy target for NLRP3-related inflammatory diseases,” Acta Biochim. Biophys. Sin. (Shanghai)., vol. 48, no. 10, pp. 966–968, 2016.</p>
    <p>N. R. Helps, H. M. Barker, S. J. Elledge, and P. T. W. Cohen, “Protein phosphatase 1 interacts with p53BP2, a protein which binds to the tumour suppressor p53,” FEBS Lett., vol. 377, no. 3, pp. 295–300, 1995.</p>
    <p>A. N. Hosein, R. A. Brekken, and A. Maitra, “Pancreatic cancer stroma: an update on therapeutic targeting strategies,” Nat. Rev. Gastroenterol. Hepatol., vol. 17, no. 8, pp. 487–505, 2020.</p>
    <p>L. De Lellis et al., “Drug repurposing, an attractive strategy in pancreatic cancer treatment: preclinical and clinical updates,” Cancers (Basel)., vol. 13, no. 16, p. 3946, 2021.</p>
    <p>M. Aziz et al., “Identification of NEK7 inhibitors: structure based virtual screening, molecular docking, density functional theory calculations and molecular dynamics simulations,” J. Biomol. Struct. Dyn., vol. 41, no. 14, pp. 6894–6908, 2023.</p>
    <p>S. Adrees et al., “In-silico analysis of potential anticancer drug for NEK7 and PPP1CA proteins overexpressed in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma,” J. Biomol. Struct. Dyn., pp. 1–17, 2024.</p>
    <p>S. Raza, K. E. Ranaghan, M. W. van der Kamp, C. J. Woods, A. J. Mulholland, and S. S. Azam, “Visualizing protein–ligand binding with chemical energy-wise decomposition (CHEWD): Application to ligand binding in the kallikrein-8 S1 Site,” J. Comput. Aided. Mol. Des., vol. 33, pp. 461–475, 2019.</p>
    <p>Y. Dong, A. Kaushal, M. Brattsand, J. Nicklin, and J. A. Clements, “Differential splicing of KLK5 and KLK7 in epithelial ovarian cancer produces novel variants with potential as cancer biomarkers,” Clin. Cancer Res., vol. 9, no. 5, pp. 1710–1720, 2003.</p>
    <p>S. Lim, K. H. Kee, M. J. Lee, R. Hong, and S. I. Han, “Extracellular acidity‑induced expression of Kallikrein‑related peptidases 7 and 8 is involved in increased invasiveness of gastric cancer cells,” Oncol. Rep., vol. 43, no. 5, pp. 1705–1713, 2020.</p>
    <p>S. S. Azam and S. Raza, “Structure modeling and hybrid virtual screening study of Alzheimer’s associated protease kallikrein 8 for the identification of novel inhibitors,” Med. Chem. Res., vol. 23, pp. 3516–3527, 2014.</p>
    <p>E. Salinas-Miranda et al., “Prognostic value of early changes in CT-measured body composition in patients receiving chemotherapy for unresectable pancreatic cancer,” Eur. Radiol., vol. 31, pp. 8662–8670, 2021.</p>
    <p>NICE, “Pancreatic Cancer in Adults: Diagnosis and Management. NICE Guideline [NG85],” 2018.</p>
    <p>N. Chen et al., “Albumin-bound nanoparticle (nab) paclitaxel exhibits enhanced paclitaxel tissue distribution and tumor penetration,” Cancer Chemother. Pharmacol., vol. 76, pp. 699–712, 2015.</p>
    <p>L. Deyme, D. Barbolosi, and F. Gattacceca, “Population pharmacokinetics of FOLFIRINOX: a review of studies and parameters,” Cancer Chemother. Pharmacol., vol. 83, pp. 27–42, 2019.</p>
    <p>A. Pugalenthi et al., “Postoperative complications and overall survival after pancreaticoduodenectomy for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma,” J. Surg. Oncol., vol. 113, no. 2, pp. 188–193, 2016.</p>
    <p>M. A. Sahakyan et al., “Laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: results of a multicenter cohort study on 196 patients,” Surg. Endosc., vol. 30, pp. 3409–3418, 2016.</p>
    <p>W. C. Johnston et al., “Total pancreatectomy for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: review of the National Cancer Data Base,” Hpb, vol. 18, no. 1, pp. 21–28, 2016.</p>
    <p>J. Perinel and M. Adham, “Palliative therapy in pancreatic cancer—palliative surgery,” Transl. Gastroenterol. Hepatol., vol. 4, 2019.</p>
    <p>J. P. Neoptolemos et al., “Influence of resection margins on survival for patients with pancreatic cancer treated by adjuvant chemoradiation and/or chemotherapy in the ESPAC-1 randomized controlled trial,” Ann. Surg., vol. 234, no. 6, pp. 758–768, 2001.</p>
    <p>B. Kedra, T. Popiela, M. Sierzega, and A. Precht, “Prognostic factors of long-term survival after resective procedures for pancreatic cancer.,” Hepatogastroenterology., vol. 48, no. 42, pp. 1762–1766, 2001.</p>
    <p>Y. Li, J. Sun, Z. Jiang, L. Zhang, and G. Liu, “Gemcitabine and S-1 combination chemotherapy versus gemcitabine alone for locally advanced and metastatic pancreatic cancer: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials in Asia,” J. Chemother., vol. 27, no. 4, pp. 227–234, 2015.</p>
    <p>M. Reni et al., “Gemcitabine versus cisplatin, epirubicin, fluorouracil, and gemcitabine in advanced pancreatic cancer: a randomised controlled multicentre phase III trial,” Lancet Oncol., vol. 6, no. 6, pp. 369–376, 2005.</p>
    <p>S. Boeck et al., “Capecitabine plus oxaliplatin (CapOx) versus capecitabine plus gemcitabine (CapGem) versus gemcitabine plus oxaliplatin (mGemOx): final results of a multicenter randomized phase II trial in advanced pancreatic cancer,” Ann. Oncol., vol. 19, no. 2, pp. 340–347, 2008.</p>
    <p>R. E. Royal et al., “Phase 2 trial of single agent Ipilimumab (anti-CTLA-4) for locally advanced or metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma,” J. Immunother., vol. 33, no. 8, pp. 828–833, 2010.</p>
    <p>F. Bengsch, D. M. Knoblock, A. Liu, F. McAllister, and G. L. Beatty, “CTLA-4/CD80 pathway regulates T cell infiltration into pancreatic cancer,” Cancer Immunol. Immunother., vol. 66, no. 12, pp. 1609–1617, 2017.</p>
    <p>M. B. Ware et al., “Dual blockade of IL-6 and CTLA-4 regresses pancreatic tumors in a CD4+ T cell-dependent manner,” bioRxiv, pp. 2002–2020, 2020.</p>
    <p>M. Feng et al., “PD-1/PD-L1 and immunotherapy for pancreatic cancer,” Cancer Lett., vol. 407, pp. 57–65, 2017.</p>
    <p>X. Wang et al., “PD-L1 is a direct target of cancer-FOXP3 in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC), and combined immunotherapy with antibodies against PD-L1 and CCL5 is effective in the treatment of PDAC,” Signal Transduct. Target. Ther., vol. 5, no. 1, p. 38, 2020.</p>
    <p>Y. Zhao et al., “PD-L1: CD80 cis-heterodimer triggers the co-stimulatory receptor CD28 while repressing the inhibitory PD-1 and CTLA-4 pathways,” Immunity, vol. 51, no. 6, pp. 1059–1073, 2019.</p>
    <p>L. Geng et al., “B7-H1 up-regulated expression in human pancreatic carcinoma tissue associates with tumor progression,” J. Cancer Res. Clin. Oncol., vol. 134, pp. 1021–1027, 2008.</p>
    <p>S. Hu et al., “Natural killer cell-based adoptive transfer immunotherapy for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma in a KrasLSL-G12D p53LSL-R172H Pdx1-Cre mouse model,” Am. J. Cancer Res., vol. 9, no. 8, p. 1757, 2019.</p>
    <p>K. Furukawa et al., “A practical approach to pancreatic cancer immunotherapy using resected tumor lysate vaccines processed to express α-gal epitopes,” PLoS One, vol. 12, no. 10, p. e0184901, 2017.</p>
    <p>X. Gu et al., “Nanotechnology-Based Strategy for Enhancing Therapeutic Efficacy in Pancreatic Cancer: Receptor-Targeted Drug Delivery by Somatostatin Analog,” Int. J. Mol. Sci., vol. 25, no. 10, p. 5545, 2024.</p>
    <p>H. Taghizadeh, L. Müllauer, R. M. Mader, M. Schindl, and G. W. Prager, “Applied precision medicine in metastatic pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma,” Ther. Adv. Med. Oncol., vol. 12, p. 1758835920938611, 2020.</p>
    <p>N. Awasthi, S. Hinz, R. A. Brekken, M. A. Schwarz, and R. E. Schwarz, “Nintedanib, a triple angiokinase inhibitor, enhances cytotoxic therapy response in pancreatic cancer,” Cancer Lett., vol. 358, no. 1, pp. 59–66, 2015.</p>
    <p>V. A. Venkatesha et al., “Sensitization of pancreatic cancer stem cells to gemcitabine by Chk1 inhibition,” Neoplasia, vol. 14, no. 6, pp. 519–525, 2012.</p>
    <p>H. Vundavilli, A. Datta, C. Sima, J. Hua, R. Lopes, and M. Bittner, “In silico design and experimental validation of combination therapy for pancreatic cancer,” IEEE/ACM Trans. Comput. Biol. Bioinforma., vol. 17, no. 3, pp. 1010–1018, 2018.</p>
    </sec>
  </body>
</article>