International Journal of Computer Science and Artificial Intelligence

DOI: 10.64823/ijcsa.2601006

⚠️ This HTML version is automatically generated from the manuscript file and may contain formatting or data discrepancies compared to the original paper. Please refer to the PDF version for the authoritative, publisher-formatted record.

INTRODUCTION

Background of the Study

Pharmaceutical companies need a good procurement system for supply of medicines and health care products. However, conventional procurement systems are highly dependent on manual methods, leading to inefficiencies in forecasting, supplier evaluation, and inventory management.

There are increasing applications of Artificial Intelligence (AI) technology like machine learning, predictive analysis, and robotics process automation to automate the procurement process. It will help in real-time decision making, predictive demand forecast, and intelligent supplier management.

The Hydrogen Pharmaceutical PLC needs procurement system modernization to increase efficiency and cost-saving.

Problem Statement

Procurement system inefficiencies still exist in the form of inaccurate forecast, inconsistent suppliers, and inventory imbalance. The organization does not have an AI based fully integrated procurement system.

Objectives

General Objective

Specific Objectives

METHODOLOGY

For the study, the research methodology employed a mixed-methods approach whereby there was domination in the use of quantitative research design. The study had both quantitative and qualitative components with the former forming the main basis of the study. However, the latter was used as a complement of the former to enrich the findings in some areas.

The study targeted population consisted of individuals who are employees from key functional departments such as Procurement, Supply Chain, Finance, IT and Management among others. This is because these departments have direct dealings with decision making processes that form the basis of the study. 60 questionnaires were issued to the sampled respondents but only 45 questionnaires were well filled and returned back for analysis.

The study used a structured questionnaire using 5-point Likert scale to collect data on the respondents’ views and perception. In this, the Likert scale ranged from 1 to 5 whereby the former represents strongly disagree while the later represented strongly agree.

Respondents' data were analyzed using both descriptive and inferential statistical tools. Descriptive statistics was used to describe the data while reliability of the measurement items was conducted using Cronbach’s Alpha. Furthermore, Pearson correlation analysis was applied to examine the relationship between variables, while multiple regression analysis was performed using SPSS to determine the effect of independent variables on the dependent variable and to assess the strength and significance of these relationships.

RESULTS

Reliability Analysis

Table 1: Cronbach’s Alpha Reliability Test

Variable

Items

Cronbach’s Alpha

Interpretation

AI Adoption

7

0.88

Reliable

Procurement Efficiency

7

0.86

Reliable

Supplier Performance

7

0.84

Reliable

Inventory Optimization

7

0.87

Reliable

Cost Reduction

7

0.85

Reliable

Strategic Performance

7

0.89

Highly Reliable

Interpretation: All constructs exceed 0.70 threshold indicating strong internal consistency.

Descriptive Statistics

Table 2: Descriptive Statistics (N = 45)

Variable

Mean

Std. Dev.

Level

AI Adoption

3.62

0.74

Moderate

Procurement Efficiency

3.89

0.69

High

Supplier Performance

3.77

0.71

High

Inventory Optimization

3.81

0.68

High

Cost Reduction

3.58

0.76

Moderate

Strategic Performance

3.91

0.65

High

Correlation Analysis

Table 3: Pearson Correlation Matrix

Variables

AI

PE

SP

IO

CR

ST

AI Adoption

1

0.71**

0.68**

0.74**

0.65**

0.79**

Procurement Efficiency

1

0.72**

0.69**

0.66**

0.81**

Supplier Performance

1

0.70**

0.63**

0.77**

Inventory Optimization

1

0.69**

0.80**

Cost Reduction

1

0.73**

Strategic Performance

1

Note: p < 0.01

Model Summary (Regression)

Table 4: Model Summary

Model

R

Adjusted R²

Std. Error

1

0.79

0.63

0.61

0.42

Interpretation: AI explains 63% of variation in strategic performance.

ANOVA Results

Table 5: ANOVA

Model

SS

df

MS

F

Sig.

Regression

18.45

5

3.69

21.34

0.000

Residual

10.87

39

0.28

Total

29.32

44

Interpretation: Model is statistically significant (p < 0.001).

Regression Coefficients

Table 6: Coefficients

Predictor

B

Std. Error

Beta

t

Sig.

Constant

0.84

0.31

2.71

0.010

AI Adoption

0.42

0.08

0.51

5.25

0.000

Supplier Performance

0.31

0.09

0.37

3.44

0.001

Inventory Optimization

0.29

0.10

0.33

2.90

0.006

Cost Reduction

0.26

0.09

0.28

2.88

0.007

Procurement Efficiency

0.38

0.07

0.45

5.43

0.000

DISCUSSION

Findings confirm that AI significantly improves procurement and strategic performance. The strongest predictor is AI adoption (β = 0.51), followed by procurement efficiency (β = 0.45).

Results align with:

CONCLUSION

This study concludes that AI-driven procurement optimization significantly enhances procurement efficiency, supplier performance management, cost reduction, and overall strategic outcomes at Hydrogen Pharmaceutical PLC. The findings demonstrate that Artificial Intelligence plays a transformative role in improving decision-making, operational responsiveness, and supply chain effectiveness. However, the organization is still in a transitional stage of AI adoption, indicating that full integration and advanced utilization of AI technologies have not yet been fully achieved.

RECOMMENDATIONS

To fully realize the strategic benefits of AI in procurement, the organization should integrate AI systems with existing ERP platforms to enable seamless data exchange and end-to-end process automation. It is also essential to strengthen data governance frameworks to ensure high-quality, consistent, and reliable data for accurate AI-driven decision-making. In addition, developing workforce AI competencies through continuous training programs will enhance employee capability and support effective system utilization. Furthermore, enhancing cybersecurity infrastructure is critical to safeguard procurement data and ensure system integrity against potential cyber threats. Finally, the organization should fully digitize procurement workflows to eliminate manual processes, improve transparency, and achieve greater efficiency and strategic agility across the procurement function.

REFERENCES

  1. Chopra, S., & Meindl, P. (2023). Supply chain management: Strategy, planning, and operation. Pearson.
  2. Christopher, M. (2023). Logistics and supply chain management. Pearson.
  3. Davenport, T. H., & Ronanki, R. (2018). Artificial intelligence for the real world. Harvard Business Review, 96(1), 108–116.
  4. Ivanov, D., & Dolgui, A. (2022). AI-driven supply chain management. International Journal of Production Research, 60(4), 1201–1215.
  5. McKinsey & Company. (2024). AI in procurement report. McKinsey.
  6. Gartner. (2024). Procurement analytics insights. Gartner Research.