International Journal of Medical and Health Sciences

DOI: 10.64823/ijmhs.2601001

⚠️ This HTML version is automatically generated from the manuscript file and may contain formatting or data discrepancies compared to the original paper. Please refer to the PDF version for the authoritative, publisher-formatted record.

Introduction

Kidney disease affects approximately 850 million people worldwide, representing a global public health crisis of enormous proportions. Among the many aetiologies of renal dysfunction, nephrotic syndrome and diabetic nephropathy stand out as particularly prevalent, morbid, and economically burdensome conditions. Together they account for the majority of cases progressing to end-stage renal disease (ESRD) requiring dialysis or transplantation.

Nephrotic syndrome is not a single disease but rather a clinical syndrome characterised by massive urinary protein loss exceeding 3.5 grams per day per 1.73 m² of body surface area. This proteinuria drives secondary abnormalities including hypoalbuminaemia, peripheral oedema, hyperlipidaemia, and lipiduria. The syndrome can arise from primary glomerular diseases such as minimal change disease (MCD), focal segmental glomerulosclerosis (FSGS), and membranous nephropathy (MN), or secondarily from systemic diseases, infections, or medications.

Diabetic nephropathy (DN), increasingly termed diabetic kidney disease (DKD) to reflect its broader pathological spectrum, is the single most common cause of ESRD in developed nations. It affects approximately 20–40% of individuals with either type 1 or type 2 diabetes mellitus and is characterised by progressive albuminuria, declining glomerular filtration rate (GFR), and cardiovascular co-morbidity. The pathological hallmark is Kimmelstiel–Wilson nodular glomerulosclerosis, alongside diffuse mesangial expansion, glomerular basement membrane thickening, and afferent/efferent arteriolar hyalinosis.

Despite their distinct aetiologies, both conditions share common pathophysiological mechanisms including podocyte injury, disruption of the glomerular filtration barrier, intraglomerular hypertension, oxidative stress, and activation of fibrogenic pathways. This review integrates current understanding of both diseases and highlights evidence-based therapeutic advances, including the transformative role of sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 (SGLT2) inhibitors in reducing renal and cardiovascular endpoints across a broad population of CKD patients.

NEPHROTIC SYNDROME

Pathophysiology of Nephrotic Syndrome

The Glomerular Filtration Barrier

The glomerular filtration barrier (GFB) is a sophisticated three-layer structure consisting of the fenestrated glomerular endothelium, the glomerular basement membrane (GBM), and the podocyte foot processes connected by the slit diaphragm. Each layer contributes both size-selectivity and charge-selectivity that restrict passage of albumin and larger molecules into the filtrate.

The slit diaphragm, composed of nephrin, podocin, CD2-associated protein (CD2AP), and other structural proteins, represents the final and most critical filtration checkpoint. Disruption of any component of the GFB—through immune-mediated mechanisms, genetic mutations, toxic insults, or haemodynamic stress—results in increased permeability to albumin and other plasma proteins.

Podocyte Biology and Injury

Podocytes are terminally differentiated, post-mitotic epithelial cells with limited regenerative capacity. Their foot processes are anchored to the GBM via αvβ3 and α1β1 integrins, while their apical surface is protected by an anti-adhesion coat of podocalyxin. Podocyte injury—characterised by foot process effacement, loss of slit diaphragm integrity, and eventual detachment—is the unifying pathological event in most proteinuric kidney diseases.

In minimal change disease, a circulating permeability factor (possibly a cytokine such as IL-13 or hemopexin) induces reversible foot process effacement without structural glomerular damage, explaining the dramatic response to corticosteroids. In FSGS, podocyte loss is more severe and may involve genetic defects in structural proteins (NPHS1, NPHS2, TRPC6, ACTN4, INF2), circulating soluble urokinase plasminogen activator receptor (suPAR), or secondary haemodynamic injury from hyperfiltration.

Downstream Consequences of Massive Proteinuria

The nephrotic state is associated with profound systemic consequences. Urinary protein loss exceeding hepatic synthesis capacity leads to hypoalbuminaemia, which reduces plasma oncotic pressure and drives fluid into the interstitium, producing the characteristic oedema. Additionally, reduced oncotic pressure stimulates hepatic lipoprotein synthesis, while catabolism of VLDL is impaired due to urinary loss of lipoprotein lipase cofactors, resulting in hypercholesterolaemia and hypertriglyceridaemia.

The hypercoagulable state in nephrotic syndrome arises from urinary loss of natural anticoagulants (antithrombin III, protein S, protein C), elevated fibrinogen from compensatory hepatic synthesis, platelet hyperaggregability, and increased blood viscosity. This predisposes to both venous and arterial thromboembolism, including the characteristic renal vein thrombosis seen particularly in membranous nephropathy.

Major Causes of Nephrotic Syndrome

Table 1 summarises the primary and secondary causes of nephrotic syndrome by frequency and clinical context:

Category

Disease Entity

Typical Age Group

Key Distinguishing Feature

Primary (Idiopathic)

Minimal Change Disease (MCD)

Children; adults possible

Normal LM; foot process effacement on EM; steroid-responsive

Primary

Focal Segmental Glomerulosclerosis (FSGS)

Young adults; Black race ↑ risk

Segmental sclerosis; NPHS1/NPHS2/TRPC6 mutations in genetic forms

Primary

Membranous Nephropathy (MN)

Middle-aged adults

PLA2R antibody positive (~70%); subepithelial immune deposits

Primary

Membranoproliferative GN (MPGN)

Young adults

Tram-track GBM; C3 deposition

Secondary

Diabetic Nephropathy

Adults with DM

Kimmelstiel-Wilson nodules; glomerulomegaly

Secondary

Lupus Nephritis (class V)

Young women

Anti-dsDNA; full-house immunofluorescence

Secondary

Amyloidosis (AA/AL)

Older adults

Congo red positivity; apple-green birefringence

Secondary

Hepatitis B/C associated

Varies

Cryoglobulinaemia; MN pattern with HBV

Genetic

Congenital NS (Finnish type)

Neonates

NPHS1 mutation; massive proteinuria at birth

Drug-induced

NSAIDs, gold, penicillamine

Adults on offending drugs

Resolution on drug withdrawal

Clinical Presentation and Diagnosis

History and Physical Examination

The classic presentation of nephrotic syndrome includes periorbital oedema (often more pronounced in the morning), dependent pitting oedema, ascites, and occasionally pleural effusions or anasarca in severe cases. Patients frequently report frothy urine due to proteinuria. Systemic symptoms such as fatigue and dyspnoea may accompany severe hypoalbuminaemia.

Physical examination may reveal anasarca, xanthelasma (from hyperlipidaemia), white nails (leukonychia), and signs of specific underlying diseases such as malar rash in lupus or peripheral neuropathy in amyloidosis. Blood pressure may be normal or elevated; in MCD it is often normal.

Laboratory Investigations

The following investigations are essential in evaluating a patient with suspected nephrotic syndrome:

Renal Biopsy

Kidney biopsy with light microscopy, immunofluorescence, and electron microscopy remains the gold standard for establishing a definitive diagnosis in adult nephrotic syndrome. In children, empirical corticosteroid treatment for presumed MCD is appropriate as the first step given its high prevalence and steroid-responsiveness in that age group. Biopsy is reserved for children with atypical features, steroid resistance, or frequent relapses.

Histopathological findings guide prognosis and therapy. The Oxford classification (MEST-C) is used for IgA nephropathy, while the Columbia classification stratifies FSGS lesions into tip, cellular, perihilar, collapsing (most severe), and not-otherwise-specified variants.

Management of Nephrotic Syndrome

General Measures

General measures applicable to all nephrotic patients include sodium restriction (<2 g/day) and judicious fluid management to address oedema. Loop diuretics (furosemide) are the mainstay of oedema management; combination with thiazide-type diuretics may be required in resistant cases. Intravenous albumin infusion followed by diuretics may benefit patients with severe hypoalbuminaemia and refractory oedema, though its routine use is debated.

Renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system (RAAS) blockade with angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEi) or angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs) reduces proteinuria and slows CKD progression and should be used unless contraindicated. Statins are recommended for hyperlipidaemia given the heightened cardiovascular risk. Anticoagulation with warfarin or low molecular weight heparin is indicated when serum albumin falls below 2.0–2.5 g/dL or when membranous nephropathy is the underlying diagnosis due to high thrombosis risk.

Disease-Specific Immunosuppressive Therapy

Therapy is tailored to the underlying cause:

Minimal Change Disease: Prednisolone at 1 mg/kg/day (maximum 80 mg/day) for 4–8 weeks achieves complete remission in >90% of adults. Frequent relapsers or steroid-dependent patients require alkylating agents (cyclophosphamide), calcineurin inhibitors (cyclosporine, tacrolimus), or rituximab (anti-CD20). Recent evidence strongly supports rituximab as a steroid-sparing agent in relapsing MCD.

Focal Segmental Glomerulosclerosis: Primary FSGS is treated with high-dose corticosteroids, though response rates are lower than in MCD (30–50% complete remission). Calcineurin inhibitors are used in steroid-resistant disease. Sparsentan, a dual endothelin-angiotensin receptor antagonist, received FDA approval in 2023 for IgA nephropathy and is under investigation for FSGS.

Membranous Nephropathy: The KDIGO 2021 guidelines recommend an initial 6-month period of conservative management (RAAS blockade, anti-PLA2R monitoring) before initiating immunosuppression. Rituximab has emerged as the preferred first-line immunosuppressive agent based on the MENTOR trial, demonstrating superiority over cyclosporine in achieving complete remission. Cyclophosphamide with alternating corticosteroids (Ponticelli regimen) remains an alternative.

DIABETIC NEPHROPATHY

Epidemiology and Natural History

Diabetic kidney disease (DKD) is the leading cause of ESRD globally, accounting for approximately 44% of new dialysis cases in the United States. The prevalence of DKD correlates with diabetes duration, glycaemic control, hypertension, dyslipidaemia, and genetic susceptibility. While the classic presentation follows the Mogensen staging system of normoalbuminuric → microalbuminuria → macroalbuminuria → declining GFR, a substantial proportion of patients with DKD exhibit GFR decline without preceding albuminuria—a non-proteinuric phenotype increasingly recognised in type 2 diabetes.

Type 1 diabetes is associated with a more predictable progression through albuminuric stages. In type 2 diabetes, the natural history is more heterogeneous, partly due to the concurrent presence of other renal comorbidities such as hypertensive nephrosclerosis and obesity-related glomerulopathy. Cardiovascular disease is a major competing risk, particularly in type 2 DM where cardiovascular mortality often precedes ESRD.

Pathophysiology of Diabetic Nephropathy

Haemodynamic Mechanisms

Hyperglycaemia induces afferent arteriolar vasodilation (mediated by nitric oxide and prostaglandins) with relative efferent arteriolar vasoconstriction (mediated by angiotensin II), producing intraglomerular hypertension and hyperfiltration. This haemodynamic stress damages the GFB, podocytes, and mesangial cells. The RAAS plays a central role: angiotensin II promotes mesangial cell contraction, TGF-β production, and extracellular matrix accumulation, driving glomerulosclerosis and tubulointerstitial fibrosis.

The tubuloglomerular feedback (TGF) mechanism is also perturbed in diabetes. Proximal tubular sodium-glucose cotransport (SGLT2) activity is upregulated in hyperglycaemia, leading to enhanced tubular sodium reabsorption, reduced distal NaCl delivery to the macula densa, and consequent afferent arteriolar vasodilation and intraglomerular hypertension. SGLT2 inhibitors correct this aberrant feedback, reducing intraglomerular pressure and offering renoprotection independent of their glucose-lowering effects.

Metabolic Mechanisms

Advanced glycation end-products (AGEs) accumulate in the glomerular basement membrane and mesangium, inducing crosslinking, reduced elasticity, and receptor-mediated (RAGE) inflammatory signalling. Activation of protein kinase C (PKC) by diacylglycerol (DAG) in hyperglycaemia promotes vascular endothelial dysfunction, increased permeability, extracellular matrix production, and TGF-β upregulation.

The polyol pathway converts excess glucose to sorbitol via aldose reductase, consuming NADPH and depleting glutathione, thereby reducing cellular antioxidant defences. The hexosamine pathway generates O-GlcNAc modifications on nuclear and cytoplasmic proteins, altering their function and contributing to insulin resistance and gene expression changes relevant to DKD pathogenesis.

Inflammatory and Fibrogenic Pathways

Chronic low-grade inflammation, characterised by infiltration of monocytes/macrophages and elevated circulating cytokines (IL-1β, IL-6, TNF-α), contributes to glomerular and tubulointerstitial injury in DKD. Podocyte injury leads to foot process effacement, podocyte detachment, and depletion, which is now recognised as a key driver of FSGS-like lesions in advanced DKD.

TGF-β signalling activates downstream SMAD2/3 pathways promoting myofibroblast differentiation, tubular epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT), and matrix metalloproteinase dysregulation, collectively driving the fibrotic remodelling of the tubulointerstitium characteristic of advanced DKD. Mineralocorticoid receptor (MR) activation in kidney cells amplifies inflammation and fibrosis, providing the rationale for MR antagonism as a therapeutic target.

Histopathology of Diabetic Nephropathy

Renal biopsy in DKD reveals a spectrum of changes that evolve with disease duration. Early changes include glomerular hypertrophy and GBM thickening (detectable within 2–3 years of diabetes onset). Mesangial expansion follows, initially diffuse and later forming the pathognomonic Kimmelstiel–Wilson (KW) nodules—ovoid, laminated, PAS-positive nodular deposits of matrix material in the periphery of the mesangium.

Afferent and efferent arteriolar hyalinosis (the latter more specific to DKD), "capsular drop" lesions (accumulation of plasma proteins between parietal epithelium and Bowman’s capsule), and "fibrin cap" lesions (eosinophilic deposits overlying peripheral capillary loops) are additional histological features. Tubulointerstitial fibrosis and tubular atrophy correlate most strongly with GFR decline. Interestingly, Armanni–Ebstein lesions (glycogen accumulation in tubular epithelial cells) are a transient feature of uncontrolled hyperglycaemia.

Diagnosis and Staging of Diabetic Nephropathy

The diagnosis of DKD is primarily clinical in the appropriate context (diabetes mellitus plus albuminuria and/or reduced eGFR, with exclusion of other causes). Biopsy is reserved for atypical presentations: absence of diabetic retinopathy (which correlates with DKD in type 1 DM), acute kidney injury, heavy haematuria, short diabetes duration, or rapid GFR decline.

Table 2 summarises the KDIGO CKD staging as applied to diabetic nephropathy:

Albuminuria Category

UACR (mg/g)

CKD Stage (eGFR)

Clinical Significance

A1 - Normal/Mildly increased

<30

G1: ≥90 mL/min

Normoalbuminuric; screen annually

A2 - Moderately increased

30–300

G2: 60–89 mL/min

Microalbuminuria; initiate RAAS blockade

A3 - Severely increased

>300

G3a: 45–59 mL/min

Macroalbuminuria; optimise all risk factors

A3 - Severely increased

>300

G3b: 30–44 mL/min

High risk; add SGLT2i/finerenone if eligible

A3 - Severely increased

>300

G4: 15–29 mL/min

Prepare for renal replacement therapy

A3 - Severely increased

>300

G5: <15 mL/min

ESRD; dialysis or transplantation

Management of Diabetic Nephropathy

Glycaemic Control

Intensive glycaemic control (HbA1c <7%) reduces the risk of developing microalbuminuria and slows progression in early DKD. The DCCT/EDIC trial in type 1 DM and the UKPDS in type 2 DM established the renal benefits of early glycaemic optimisation. However, in advanced CKD (eGFR <30 mL/min), many glucose-lowering agents require dose adjustment or cessation. Metformin is contraindicated below eGFR 30 mL/min. Individualization of HbA1c targets (7–8%) is recommended in patients with advanced DKD given hypoglycaemia risk.

Blood Pressure Management and RAAS Blockade

The KDIGO 2022 guidelines recommend a blood pressure target of <120/80 mmHg in patients with DKD and proteinuria, based on the SPRINT trial. ACEi or ARBs are first-line antihypertensives in DKD due to their additional renoprotective effects beyond blood pressure reduction, including reduction of intraglomerular pressure and proteinuria. Dual RAAS blockade (ACEi + ARB) is not recommended due to excess risk of hyperkalaemia and acute kidney injury (ONTARGET trial).

SGLT2 Inhibitors: A Paradigm Shift

Sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors have transformed the management of DKD in the past decade. The CREDENCE trial (canagliflozin), DAPA-CKD trial (dapagliflozin), and EMPA-KIDNEY trial (empagliflozin) each demonstrated significant reductions in composite renal endpoints, including a 30–40% reduction in ESRD, doubling of serum creatinine, or renal death. Notably, DAPA-CKD and EMPA-KIDNEY included non-diabetic CKD patients, confirming that benefits extend beyond glucose control.

The mechanisms of renoprotection include: (1) restoration of tubuloglomerular feedback with consequent reduction in intraglomerular hypertension; (2) reduction in sodium and fluid retention; (3) anti-inflammatory and anti-fibrotic effects; (4) metabolic switch toward ketone oxidation and improved mitochondrial efficiency; and (5) weight reduction with consequent lowering of glomerular hyperfiltration from obesity-related mechanisms. SGLT2 inhibitors are now recommended in DKD patients with eGFR ≥20 mL/min and UACR ≥30 mg/g by both KDIGO and ADA/EASD guidelines.

Finerenone: Selective Mineralocorticoid Receptor Antagonist

Finerenone, a non-steroidal, selective mineralocorticoid receptor antagonist (MRA), demonstrated renal and cardiovascular benefits in the FIDELIO-DKD and FIGARO-DKD trials. Unlike spironolactone and eplerenone, finerenone has higher receptor selectivity and tissue distribution favouring kidney and heart over vasculature, with a lower risk of hyperkalaemia and no androgenic side effects. The combined FIDELITY analysis showed a 23% reduction in composite renal outcomes.

Finerenone is indicated in patients with type 2 DM, eGFR ≥25 mL/min, and UACR ≥30 mg/g on maximal ACEi/ARB therapy, provided serum potassium ≤5.0 mmol/L at initiation. It is now incorporated into the KDIGO 2022 guidelines as a complementary agent alongside SGLT2 inhibitors.

GLP-1 Receptor Agonists

Glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (liraglutide, semaglutide, dulaglutide) have demonstrated cardiorenal benefits in cardiovascular outcomes trials. The FLOW trial (semaglutide) specifically designed to assess renal outcomes in DKD, demonstrated a 24% reduction in the primary composite renal endpoint. GLP-1 RAs reduce albuminuria, promote weight loss, lower blood pressure, and have anti-inflammatory effects that may directly benefit the kidney. They are recommended in patients with type 2 DM and DKD, particularly those with cardiovascular disease or high cardiovascular risk.

Dietary and Lifestyle Measures

Dietary protein restriction to 0.8 g/kg/day is recommended in advanced DKD to reduce glomerular hyperfiltration and uraemic substrate generation. Sodium restriction (<2.3 g/day) enhances the efficacy of RAAS blockade and reduces fluid retention. Smoking cessation is strongly recommended as tobacco use accelerates DKD progression. Regular aerobic exercise, weight reduction in obese patients, and management of anaemia (with erythropoiesis-stimulating agents and iron replacement) complete the multidisciplinary approach.

COMPARISION, OVERLAP, AND EMERGING THERAPIES

Distinguishing Nephrotic Syndrome from Diabetic Nephropathy

While massive proteinuria is the cardinal feature of both nephrotic syndrome and advanced DKD, several clinical, laboratory, and histopathological features aid in their distinction:

Feature

Primary Nephrotic Syndrome

Diabetic Nephropathy

Setting

Any age; no metabolic disease required

Established diabetes mellitus (typically >5–10 years)

Haematuria

May be present (MPGN, lupus)

Absent (haematuria prompts biopsy)

Hypertension

Variable; often mild in MCD

Usually present and often severe

Diabetic Retinopathy

Absent

Usually present in type 1 DM (strong correlation)

Complement Levels

Low in MPGN, lupus; normal in MCD, FSGS, MN

Normal

Anti-PLA2R Antibody

Positive in ~70% of primary MN

Negative

eGFR at Presentation

Often preserved in MCD; variable in FSGS/MN

Progressive decline over years

Histology

Disease-specific (e.g. foot process effacement, KW nodules absent)

KW nodules, GBM thickening, arteriolar hyalinosis

Response to Steroids

Excellent in MCD; variable in FSGS

No role for immunosuppression

Thrombosis Risk

Very high (especially MN, serum albumin <2 g/dL)

Elevated but lower than nephrotic syndrome

Shared Pathophysiology and Therapeutic Synergies

Despite distinct primary aetiologies, nephrotic syndrome and DKD share several pathophysiological nodes: podocyte injury, disruption of the slit diaphragm, activation of the RAAS, intraglomerular hypertension, and progression through common fibrogenic pathways involving TGF-β and NF-κB. These shared mechanisms explain why RAAS blockade benefits both conditions and why SGLT2 inhibitors demonstrate renoprotection even in non-diabetic proteinuric kidney diseases.

The DAPA-CKD trial included patients with IgA nephropathy, FSGS, and other proteinuric non-diabetic CKDs, demonstrating that the renal benefits of dapagliflozin were consistent across subgroups. This broadens the therapeutic scope of SGLT2 inhibitors considerably. Similarly, sparsentan’s dual endothelin-angiotensin receptor antagonism shows promise in proteinuric glomerular diseases regardless of cause.

Emerging Therapeutic Targets

The therapeutic landscape for both nephrotic syndrome and DKD continues to evolve rapidly:

Endothelin Receptor Antagonists: Sparsentan (dual AT1/ETA receptor antagonist) demonstrated significant proteinuria reduction in the DUPLEX trial in IgA nephropathy and is under evaluation in FSGS. Endothelin-1 promotes mesangial contraction, podocyte injury, and tubulointerstitial fibrosis, making ET-1 blockade an attractive target.

Complement Inhibition: C3 glomerulopathy and certain forms of MPGN with complement dysregulation are increasingly targeted with complement inhibitors (avacopan, pegcetacoplan, iptacopan). Iptacopan, a factor B inhibitor, received FDA approval for paroxysmal nocturnal haemoglobinuria and is under investigation in complement-mediated GN.

Rituximab and B-cell Depletion: Rituximab has become standard of care for frequently relapsing or steroid-dependent MCD and primary MN, with evidence from multiple randomised controlled trials including GEMRITUX, MENTOR, and RI-CYCLO.

JAK Inhibition: Baricitinib and other JAK inhibitors are being evaluated in lupus nephritis and other immune-mediated glomerular diseases, targeting the JAK-STAT signalling pathway central to cytokine-driven inflammation.

Aldosterone Synthase Inhibition: Baxdrostat, an aldosterone synthase (CYP11B2) inhibitor, is under evaluation for treatment-resistant hypertension with CKD, potentially offering RAAS blockade benefits with fewer side effects than MR antagonists.

Atrasentan: This selective ETA receptor antagonist demonstrated significant proteinuria reduction in the SONAR trial and is being re-evaluated in combination with SGLT2 inhibitors for DKD.

Monitoring and Follow-Up

Both conditions require systematic long-term monitoring. For nephrotic syndrome, follow-up should assess proteinuria (UACR or 24-hour urine), serum albumin, eGFR, lipid profile, blood pressure, oedema status, and treatment toxicity at 1–3 monthly intervals during active disease. Immunological markers (anti-PLA2R titres in MN, complement levels in MPGN) guide treatment decisions.

For DKD, KDIGO recommends at minimum annual monitoring of UACR and eGFR in all diabetic patients. Patients with UACR >30 mg/g or eGFR <60 mL/min should be monitored every 3–6 months. Serum potassium must be monitored closely when using RAAS blockers and finerenone. Haemoglobin, calcium-phosphate metabolism, and parathyroid hormone should be tracked in CKD G3b and beyond.

Special Populations

Paediatric Nephrotic Syndrome

In children, nephrotic syndrome is predominantly MCD (~90% of cases in children under 10). The first episode is treated empirically with corticosteroids without biopsy. Steroid-responsive patients have an excellent long-term renal prognosis. Genetic causes should be considered in children with steroid-resistant nephrotic syndrome, particularly under 1 year of age.

Nephrotic Syndrome in Pregnancy

Pre-eclampsia is the most common cause of nephrotic-range proteinuria in pregnancy and must be differentiated from primary glomerular disease. Management involves close blood pressure control, timing of delivery, and cautious use of anticoagulation given thrombosis risk.

Elderly Patients with DKD

Older adults with DKD have a higher burden of polypharmacy, falls risk, hypoglycaemia, and frailty. HbA1c targets are relaxed to 7.5–8.5% in frail elderly patients. SGLT2 inhibitors should be used with caution given the risk of volume depletion and urinary tract infections; genital mycotic infections are also more common in the elderly.

Transition to End-Stage Renal Disease

Both nephrotic syndrome (particularly FSGS and secondary causes) and DKD carry significant risk of progression to ESRD. Preparation for renal replacement therapy should begin when eGFR falls to 20–25 mL/min. Options include haemodialysis, peritoneal dialysis, and kidney transplantation. Pre-emptive transplantation, when eGFR falls to 15–20 mL/min, is associated with the best outcomes. Living donor transplantation offers superior graft survival compared to deceased donor transplantation.

In patients with DKD and type 2 DM who are transplant candidates, simultaneous pancreas-kidney (SPK) transplantation may be considered in carefully selected patients. Recurrence of primary FSGS post-transplantation occurs in up to 30–40% of cases and is mediated by the same circulating permeability factor implicated in primary disease; rituximab and plasma exchange are used prophylactically and therapeutically.

Conclusion

Nephrotic syndrome and diabetic nephropathy are distinct but overlapping clinical entities that together represent the leading causes of chronic kidney disease and ESRD globally. A thorough understanding of their pathophysiology, accurate diagnostic evaluation—including the judicious use of renal biopsy—and application of evidence-based, targeted therapies are essential for optimising patient outcomes.

The past decade has witnessed transformative advances in treatment, particularly the emergence of SGLT2 inhibitors and finerenone as renoprotective agents with benefits extending beyond glucose control to encompass broad anti-inflammatory, anti-fibrotic, and haemodynamic mechanisms. Rituximab has become standard of care in immune-mediated nephrotic syndrome. Further progress in precision medicine, including genetic testing for podocytopathies, biomarker-guided therapy in membranous nephropathy, and complement pathway targeting in specific glomerulopathies, holds great promise for the future.

Multidisciplinary collaboration among nephrologists, endocrinologists, cardiologists, dietitians, and primary care providers remains the cornerstone of comprehensive CKD care in both nephrotic syndrome and diabetic nephropathy. Ongoing clinical trials will continue to refine the therapeutic armamentarium and improve the prospects of patients living with these challenging conditions.

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to express their sincere gratitude to colleagues and mentors in the fields of nephrology and endocrinology whose guidance and insights greatly enriched the preparation of this review. We acknowledge the contributions of researchers whose pioneering work in nephrotic syndrome and diabetic nephropathy has provided the foundation for this synthesis. Special thanks are extended to the academic and clinical staff who offered valuable feedback on earlier drafts, and to the institutions that facilitated access to relevant literature and resources. Finally, we appreciate the support of our families and peers, whose encouragement made the completion of this work possible.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest related to the preparation, writing, or publication of this review article. No financial support, grants, or sponsorships were received from pharmaceutical companies, medical device manufacturers, or other organizations that could influence the content of this work. The article was developed independently, and all interpretations and conclusions are solely those of the authors.

References

  1. KDIGO 2021 Clinical Practice Guideline for the Management of Glomerular Diseases. Kidney Int. 2021;100(4S): S1–S276.
  2. KDIGO 2022 Clinical Practice Guideline for Diabetes Management in Chronic Kidney Disease. Kidney Int. 2022;102(5S): S1–S127.
  3. KDIGO 2024 Clinical Practice Guideline for the Evaluation and Management of Chronic Kidney Disease. Kidney Int. 2024;105(4S): S117–S314.
  4. American Diabetes Association. Standards of Medical Care in Diabetes — 2024. Diabetes Care. 2024;47(Suppl 1): S1–S321.
  5. Perkovic V, et al. Canagliflozin and Renal Outcomes in Type 2 Diabetes and Nephropathy. N Engl J Med. 2019;380(24):2295–2306. (CREDENCE)
  6. Heerspink HJL, et al. Dapagliflozin in Patients with Chronic Kidney Disease. N Engl J Med. 2020;383(15):1436–1446. (DAPA-CKD)
  7. The EMPA-KIDNEY Collaborative Group. Empagliflozin in Patients with Chronic Kidney Disease. N Engl J Med. 2023;388(2):117–127. (EMPA-KIDNEY)
  8. Zinman B, et al. Empagliflozin, Cardiovascular Outcomes, and Mortality in Type 2 Diabetes. N Engl J Med. 2015;373(22):2117–2128. (EMPA-REG OUTCOME)
  9. Neal B, et al. Canagliflozin and Cardiovascular and Renal Events in Type 2 Diabetes. N Engl J Med. 2017;377(7):644–657. (CANVAS Program)
  10. Bakris GL, et al. Effect of Finerenone on Chronic Kidney Disease Outcomes in Type 2 Diabetes. N Engl J Med. 2020;383(23):2219–2229. (FIDELIO-DKD)
  11. Filippatos G, et al. Finerenone and Cardiovascular Outcomes in Patients with Chronic Kidney Disease and Type 2 Diabetes. Circulation. 2021;143(25):2346–2352. (FIGARO-DKD)
  12. Agarwal R, et al. FIDELITY: Pooled Analysis of FIDELIO-DKD and FIGARO-DKD. Eur Heart J. 2022;43(6):474–484.
  13. Perkovic V, et al. Effects of Semaglutide on Chronic Kidney Disease in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes. N Engl J Med. 2024;391(2):109–121. (FLOW)
  14. Marso SP, et al. Liraglutide and Cardiovascular Outcomes in Type 2 Diabetes. N Engl J Med. 2016;375(4):311–322. (LEADER)
  15. Gerstein HC, et al. Dulaglutide and Renal Outcomes in Type 2 Diabetes: An Exploratory Analysis of the REWIND Randomised, Placebo-Controlled Trial. Lancet. 2019;394(10193):131–138.
  16. Ruggenenti P, et al. Rituximab versus Cyclosporine in Idiopathic Membranous Nephropathy. N Engl J Med. 2017;376(21):1905–1916. (MENTOR)
  17. Beck LH Jr, et al. M-type Phospholipase A2 Receptor as Target Antigen in Idiopathic Membranous Nephropathy. N Engl J Med. 2009;361(1):11–21.
  18. Rovin BH, et al. Executive Summary of the KDIGO 2021 Guideline for the Management of Glomerular Diseases: Membranous Nephropathy. Kidney Int. 2022;102(3):513–517.
  19. Fervenza FC, et al. Rituximab or Cyclosporine in the Treatment of Membranous Nephropathy. N Engl J Med. 2019;381(1):36–46.
  20. Trachtman H, et al. A Phase 2, Randomized, Placebo-Controlled, Dose-Finding Clinical Trial of Sparsentan in FSGS. Kidney Int. 2018;94(5):796–806.
  21. Rovin BH, et al. Sparsentan versus Irbesartan in Focal Segmental Glomerulosclerosis (DUPLEX): A Randomised, Double-Blind, Active-Controlled Trial. Lancet. 2023;401(10385):1370–1380.
  22. Ravani P, et al. Rituximab in Children with Steroid-Dependent Nephrotic Syndrome: A Multicenter, Open-Label, Noninferiority, Randomized Controlled Trial. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2015;26(9):2259–2266.
  23. Iijima K, et al. Rituximab for Childhood-Onset, Complicated, Frequently Relapsing Nephrotic Syndrome or Steroid-Dependent Nephrotic Syndrome. Lancet. 2014;384(9950):1273–1281.
  24. Bhatt K, et al. MicroRNA-687 Induced by Hypoxia-Inducible Factor-1 Mediates TGF-β-Induced Podocyte Injury. Kidney Int. 2017;92(2):324–333.
  25. Haraldsson B, et al. Properties of the Glomerular Barrier and Mechanisms of Proteinuria. Physiol Rev. 2008;88(2):451–487.
  26. Tonneijck L, et al. Glomerular Hyperfiltration in Diabetes: Mechanisms, Clinical Significance, and Treatment. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2017;28(4):1023–1039.
  27. Alicic RZ, Rooney MT, Tuttle KR. Diabetic Kidney Disease: Challenges, Progress, and Possibilities. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2017;12(12):2032–2045.
  28. Susztak K, et al. Diabetic Nephropathy: The Coming of Age of Tubular Involvement. Nat Rev Nephrol. 2022; 18:519–534.
  29. Reidy K, et al. Molecular Mechanisms of Diabetic Kidney Disease. J Clin Invest. 2014;124(6):2333–2340.
  30. Zoccali C, et al. Inflammation in Chronic Kidney Disease: A Prominent Role for Interleukin-6. Kidney Int Suppl (2011). 2017;7(1):8–12.
  31. Lewis EJ, et al. Renoprotective Effect of the Angiotensin-Receptor Antagonist Irbesartan in Patients with Nephropathy Due to Type 2 Diabetes. N Engl J Med. 2001;345(12):851–860. (IDNT)
  32. Brenner BM, et al. Effects of Losartan on Renal and Cardiovascular Outcomes in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes and Nephropathy. N Engl J Med. 2001;345(12):861–869. (RENAAL)
  33. SPRINT Research Group. A Randomized Trial of Intensive versus Standard Blood-Pressure Control. N Engl J Med. 2015;373(22):2103–2116. (SPRINT)
  34. Mann JF, et al. Renal Outcomes with Telmisartan, Ramipril, or Both, in People at High Vascular Risk (the ONTARGET Study): A Multicentre, Randomised, Double-Blind, Controlled Trial. Lancet. 2008;372(9638):547–553.
  35. Barratt J, et al. Targeted-Release Budesonide versus Placebo in Patients with IgA Nephropathy (NEFIGAN): A Double-Blind, Randomised, Placebo-Controlled Phase 2b Trial. Lancet. 2017;389(10084):2117–2127.
  36. Rovin BH, et al. Sparsentan versus Irbesartan in IgA Nephropathy. N Engl J Med. 2023;388(13):1177–1187.
  37. Jayne DRW, et al. Avacopan for the Treatment of ANCA-Associated Vasculitis. N Engl J Med. 2021;384(7):599–609.
  38. Bikbov B, et al. Global, Regional, and National Burden of Chronic Kidney Disease, 1990–2017: A Systematic Analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2017. Lancet. 2020;395(10225):709–733.