International Journal of Technology and Emerging Research

DOI: 10.64823/ijter.2503031

⚠️ This HTML version is automatically generated from the manuscript file and may contain formatting or data discrepancies compared to the original paper. Please refer to the PDF version for the authoritative, publisher-formatted record.

Acoustic studies of cefotaxime sodium in aqueous medium at different temperatures and at frequency 5 MHz under atmospheric pressure

K. P. Sarkar1, D. S. Panchbhai2, and S. A. Shah2

1VMV College, Wardhaman Nagar, Nagpur, Maharashtra, India.

2Department of Chemistry, Anand Niketan College, Warora, Maharashtra, India.

Corresponding author: kavitasarkar03@gmail.com

_____________________________________________________________________________________

ABSTRACT

Ultrasonic velocity (U) and density (ρ) measurements have been performed for the antibiotic Cefotaxime Sodium in aqueous solution at five temperatures: 20°C, 25°C, 30°C, 35°C, and 40°C. These experimental values were employed to compute several thermodynamic and acoustic parameters, including adiabatic compressibility (βₐ), change in adiabatic compressibility (Δβ), relative adiabatic compressibility (Δβ/β°), apparent molal volume (Φᵥ), apparent molal compressibility (Φₖ), and their respective limiting values, Φ°ᵥ and Φ°ₖ. The variation of these parameters with temperature and concentration was analysed to explore the structure-making or structure-breaking behaviour of Cefotaxime Sodium in aqueous medium. The findings provide valuable insights into solute–solvent interactions and the molecular characteristics of this β-lactam antibiotic under thermal perturbation.

Keywords: Ultrasonic velocity, Interferometer, Cefotaxime Sodium, adiabatic compressibility, apparent molal volume, Aqueous medium.

INTRODUCTION

Understanding the molecular interactions between solutes and solvents in solution is critical for predicting the physicochemical behavior of pharmaceutical compounds, particularly antibiotics. Among various experimental techniques, ultrasonic velocity measurements have proven to be a powerful, non-invasive method for probing solute–solvent interactions, hydrogen bonding, and structural organization in liquids. These interactions significantly influence the stability, solubility, and bioavailability of drugs, and thus have direct implications for formulation science and therapeutic efficacy [1-2].

Cefotaxime sodium is a third-generation cephalosporin antibiotic known for its broad-spectrum antibacterial activity. It is commonly used to treat respiratory tract infections, urinary tract infections, meningitis, and is also administered prophylactically during surgical procedures to prevent postoperative infections. Despite its clinical importance, a deeper understanding of how this antibiotic behaves in aqueous media at the molecular level is essential for optimizing its formulation and delivery, especially under varying thermal and concentration conditions [3-6].

In recent years, researchers have employed acoustic, volumetric, and viscometric techniques to evaluate molecular interactions in aqueous solutions of various antibiotics such as vancomycin, doxycycline, and ampicillin. These studies utilize experimental measurements—ultrasonic velocity, density, and viscosity—to calculate acoustic and thermodynamic parameters such as adiabatic compressibility, apparent molal volume, intermolecular free length, and others, which offer valuable insights into solute–solvent affinity, molecular packing, and structure-making or structure-breaking tendencies [7-10].

In the present investigation, the ultrasonic velocity, density, and viscosity of aqueous solutions of Cefotaxime sodium were measured at five temperatures (20°C, 25°C, 30°C, 35°C, and 40°C) and at varying molar concentrations, using a constant frequency of 5 MHz. From the experimental data, parameters such as adiabatic compressibility (βₐ), apparent molal volume (Φᵥ), apparent molal compressibility (Φₖ), and their limiting values were calculated. These parameters were then analyzed to interpret the nature and strength of molecular interactions, with particular attention to temperature-dependent structural modifications in the aqueous environment [7, 12-13].

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The antibiotic drug Cefotaxime sodium used in this study was procured from Laborate Pharmaceuticals India Limited. All solutions were prepared using double-distilled water to ensure purity and minimize ionic interference.

Density measurements were carried out using a Mettler Toledo handheld density meter, which offers high precision and is widely used for solution studies in pharmaceutical and chemical research [14-15]. To maintain consistent thermal conditions, a special thermostatic water bath was employed. The setup included continuous water circulation using an electric stirrer, and temperature control was achieved using an electronically operated digital constant temperature water bath with a precision of ±0.1°C [16-17].

Ultrasonic velocity measurements were conducted using a single crystal ultrasonic interferometer (Mittal type, Model F-83), operating in the frequency range of 1–10 MHz. For this investigation, measurements were made at a fixed frequency of 5 MHz, with a velocity accuracy of ±0.1 m·s⁻¹. This technique is a standard and reliable method for probing molecular interactions in liquid systems [18-21].

The densities and ultrasonic velocities of pure water and aqueous solutions of Cefotaxime sodium were measured over a concentration range from 0.01 mol·kg⁻¹ to 0.1 mol·kg⁻¹, at five different temperatures: 20°C, 25°C, 30°C, 35°C, and 40°C. Each measurement was repeated at least three times to ensure reproducibility and reliability of the data.

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

In the present investigation, experimental measurements of density (ρ), viscosity (η), and ultrasonic velocity (u) were carried out for Cefotaxime sodium solutions in water across various concentrations and temperatures. These fundamental measurements enabled the evaluation of several derived acoustic and thermodynamic parameters, which provide valuable insights into the solute–solvent interactions and structural behavior of the system.

1. Adiabatic Compressibility (βₐ):

The adiabatic compressibility of the solution is a key parameter reflecting the ease with which a medium can be compressed under adiabatic conditions. It is calculated using the following relation:

βa=1u2ρ

where u = ultrasonic velocity

ρ = density of the solution

2. Change in Adiabatic Compressibility (Δβ):

To evaluate the effect of solute on the compressibility of the medium, the change in adiabatic compressibility is calculated by:

β=βa-β0

where β0 is the compressibility of pure solvent (water).

3. Apparent Molal Volume (Φᵥ):

The apparent molal volume, which provides information about the solute–solvent interactions and solvation behavior, is given by:

Фv=1000ρ0-ρmρ0ρ+Mρ

Where ρ0 = density of pure solvent

M = molar mass of Cefotaxime sodium

m = molality

4. Apparent Molal Compressibility (Φₖ):

The apparent molal compressibility reflects the contribution of the solute to the compressibility of the solution and is calculated using:

Φₖ=1000(βa-β0)mρ0+βaФv

5. Specific Acoustic Impedance (Z):

The specific acoustic impedance, representing the resistance to sound propagation in a medium, is determined from the product of ultrasonic velocity and density:

Z = u⋅ρ

6. Relative Association (RA):

Relative association is a function of both ultrasonic velocity and density, and provides insight into solute–solvent molecular associations:

RA=ρρ0(u0u)1/3

Where u0 and ρ0= velocity and density of the solvent

u and ρ = corresponding values for the solution

7. Relative Adiabatic Compressibility (RAC): The relative adiabatic compressibility, which quantifies the fractional change in compressibility upon solute addition, is expressed as:

RAC=ββ0

These derived parameters were analyzed to assess the structure-making or structure-breaking tendencies of Cefotaxime sodium and to interpret the nature and extent of molecular interactions in the aqueous medium.

Table 1: Acoustic parameters of aqueous solution of Cefotaxime sodium at 20°C.

Conc.

Ultrasonic velocity u (cm/s)

Adiabatic Compressibility βa dyn-1.cm2

Acoustic Impedance Z dyn-1.cm2

App. Molar Volume Фv cm3.mol-1

App.Mol.Compr. Фk cm5. dyn-1mol-1

0.01

149200

4.49E-11

1.49E+05

259.02

-5.31E-08

0.02

150000

4.43E-11

1.50E+05

267.50

-4.89E-08

0.03

150700

4.39E-11

1.51E+05

273.31

-4.50E-08

0.04

151300

4.34E-11

1.52E+05

278.47

-4.13E-08

0.05

151800

4.31E-11

1.53E+05

279.33

-3.80E-08

0.06

152300

4.27E-11

1.54E+05

279.73

-3.58E-08

0.07

152800

4.23E-11

1.55E+05

281.31

-3.41E-08

0.08

153500

4.19E-11

1.56E+05

282.37

-3.42E-08

0.09

153700

4.17E-11

1.56E+05

283.07

-3.12E-08

0.1

154200

4.14E-11

1.57E+05

283.53

-3.04E-08

Table 2: Acoustic parameters of aqueous solution of Cefotaxime sodium at 25°C.

Conc.

Ultrasonic velocity u (cm/s)

Adiabatic Compressibility βa dyn-1.cm2

Acoustic Impedance Z dyn-1.cm2

App. Molar Volume Фv cm3.mol-1

App.Mol.Compr. Фk cm5. dyn-1mol-1

0.01

150600

4.48E-11

1.49E+05

262.07

-5.15E-08

0.02

151300

4.41E-11

1.50E+05

269.06

-4.46E-08

0.03

151900

4.36E-11

1.51E+05

276.06

-3.98E-08

0.04

152500

4.32E-11

1.52E+05

278.54

-3.74E-08

0.05

152900

4.28E-11

1.53E+05

279.00

-3.37E-08

0.06

153400

4.25E-11

1.54E+05

281.66

-3.20E-08

0.07

153800

4.21E-11

1.55E+05

282.98

-2.99E-08

0.08

154200

4.18E-11

1.55E+05

284.73

-2.83E-08

0.09

154700

4.15E-11

1.56E+05

285.86

-2.77E-08

0.1

155300

4.12E-11

1.57E+05

286.97

-2.77E-08

Table 3: Acoustic parameters of aqueous solution of Cefotaxime sodium at 30°C.

Conc.

Ultrasonic velocity u (cm/s)

Adiabatic Compressibility βa dyn-1.cm2

Acoustic Impedance Z dyn-1.cm2

App. Molar Volume Фv cm3.mol-1

App.Mol.Compr. Фk cm5. dyn-1mol-1

0.01

151600

4.36E-11

1.51E+05

266.18

-4.44E-08

0.02

152300

4.31E-11

1.52E+05

274.20

-4.05E-08

0.03

152900

4.27E-11

1.53E+05

280.55

-3.68E-08

0.04

153400

4.24E-11

1.54E+05

282.71

-3.35E-08

0.05

153900

4.20E-11

1.55E+05

283.79

-3.16E-08

0.06

154400

4.17E-11

1.55E+05

285.51

-3.01E-08

0.07

154800

4.14E-11

1.56E+05

287.47

-2.82E-08

0.08

155200

4.11E-11

1.57E+05

288.04

-2.69E-08

0.09

155700

4.08E-11

1.58E+05

288.26

-2.64E-08

0.1

156200

4.04E-11

1.58E+05

288.24

-2.60E-08

Table 4: Acoustic parameters of aqueous solution of Cefotaxime sodium at 35°C.

Conc.

Ultrasonic velocity u (cm/s)

Adiabatic Compressibility βa dyn-1.cm2

Acoustic Impedance Z dyn-1.cm2

App. Molar Volume Фv cm3.mol-1

App.Mol.Compr. Фk cm5. dyn-1mol-1

0.01

152800

4.30E-11

1.52E+05

274.36

-4.28E-08

0.02

153500

4.25E-11

1.53E+05

281.91

-3.90E-08

0.03

154100

4.21E-11

1.54E+05

286.10

-3.56E-08

0.04

154500

4.18E-11

1.55E+05

289.95

-3.09E-08

0.05

154900

4.15E-11

1.55E+05

290.23

-2.82E-08

0.06

155400

4.12E-11

1.56E+05

291.09

-2.73E-08

0.07

155700

4.10E-11

1.57E+05

291.11

-2.51E-08

0.08

156000

4.07E-11

1.57E+05

290.88

-2.34E-08

0.09

156500

4.04E-11

1.58E+05

290.69

-2.33E-08

0.1

156800

4.02E-11

1.59E+05

292.59

-2.20E-08

Table 5: Acoustic parameters of aqueous solution of Cefotaxime sodium at 40°C.

Conc.

Ultrasonic velocity u (cm/s)

Adiabatic Compressibility βa dyn-1.cm2

Acoustic Impedance Z dyn-1.cm2

App. Molar Volume Фv cm3.mol-1

App.Mol.Compr. Фk cm5. dyn-1mol-1

0.01

153500

4.27E-11

1.53E+05

278.55

-3.63E-08

0.02

154100

4.23E-11

1.53E+05

287.66

-3.25E-08

0.03

154600

4.19E-11

1.54E+05

291.70

-2.92E-08

0.04

155000

4.16E-11

1.55E+05

293.71

-2.61E-08

0.05

155500

4.13E-11

1.56E+05

294.91

-2.54E-08

0.06

155800

4.11E-11

1.56E+05

295.88

-2.30E-08

0.07

156300

4.07E-11

1.57E+05

296.57

-2.28E-08

0.08

156800

4.04E-11

1.58E+05

297.86

-2.26E-08

0.09

157200

4.01E-11

1.58E+05

298.06

-2.19E-08

0.1

157500

3.99E-11

1.59E+05

299.26

-2.07E-08

Fig 1: Concentration vs. Density

Fig. 2: Concentration vs. Ultrasonic Velocity

Fig. 3: Concentration vs. Adiabatic Compressibility

Fig. 4: Concentration vs. Apparent molal volume

Fig. 5: Concentration vs. Apparent molal compressibility

The acoustic parameters of Cefotaxime sodium solutions were evaluated over a concentration range of 0.01–0.10 M at five different temperatures (20°C, 25°C, 30°C, 35°C, and 40°C) using a 5 MHz ultrasonic frequency. The variation in ultrasonic velocity (𝑢), adiabatic compressibility (βₐ), acoustic impedance (Z), apparent molar volume (Φᵥ), and apparent molar compressibility (Φₖ) reveals valuable insights into the solute–solvent and solute–solute interactions in the solution medium. The key observations and their implications are discussed below:

The observed increase in ultrasonic velocity with both concentration and temperature reflects enhanced molecular interactions between Cefotaxime sodium and water molecules, primarily through hydrogen bonding and ion–dipole forces. This behavior, coupled with the consistent decrease in adiabatic compressibility (βₐ), indicates increased molecular cohesion and reduced free volume, signifying the solute’s structure-making propensity.

The slight rise in acoustic impedance (Z) with increasing concentration and temperature is attributed to the combined effects of elevated density and velocity, suggesting greater resistance to sound propagation due to reinforced intermolecular interactions. Apparent molar volume (Φᵥ) exhibits a positive trend, indicating solute expansion through hydration shell formation and thermal effects. Concurrently, the apparent molar compressibility (Φₖ) becomes progressively less negative, signifying a reduction in solute–solvent interactions at higher concentrations and temperatures, alongside a transition toward solute–solute dominance.

Overall, the acoustic and volumetric data consistently support the classification of Cefotaxime sodium as a structure-making solute in aqueous media. These findings offer valuable insights into its solvation behavior and molecular interaction dynamics, with significant implications for pharmaceutical formulation, stability, and transport mechanisms in biological systems.

CONCLUSION:

Density and sound velocity data was used to study the volumetric behavior of antibiotics cefotaxime sodium in water at different concentrations and temperatures. Density and sound velocity of antibiotic solutions cefotaxime sodium are measured which decreases and increases respectively with temperature due to increase in vibrations and kinetic energy. It is concluded that the values of apparent molar volume (Φᵥ)

calculated using density and sound velocity for all concentrations of solution at all temperatures are found positive which indicates the presence of strong ion-solvent interactions. Decrease in value of (Φᵥ) with rise in temperature suggests that increase in temperature causes strong ion-solvent interactions. The values of slope of line of apparent molar volume (Sv), which is a measure of ion pair interactions, are negative, showing the presence of weak solute-solute interactions. Higher negative values of apparent molar isentropic compressibility (Φₖ) indicate a closed-packed structure in both antibiotic solutions owing to ion-solvent interactions. The higher negative values of partial molal isentropic compressibility (Φₖ) and positive values of slope of line of apparent molal isentropic compressibility (Sk) indicate weak solute-solute interactions.

The study reveals that Cefotaxime sodium acts as a structure-making solute in aqueous solutions, as indicated by increasing density, ultrasonic velocity, and apparent molar volume, and decreasing compressibility with concentration. These trends reflect strong solute-solvent interactions, especially at lower concentrations, which weaken with rising temperature and shift toward solute-solute interactions at higher concentrations. Apparent molar volume data further confirm enhanced hydration around the drug. These insights are valuable for optimizing drug formulation and understanding β-lactam behavior in solution.

ACKNOWLEDGEMENT

The author is thankful to Dr. D. S. Panchbhai, Dr. S. A. Shah and Principal of Anand Niketan College, Anandwan, Warora for the encouragement and for providing the facilities.

REFERENCES

  1. Taboada, P., Gutiérrez-Pichel, M., Barbosa, S., & Mosquera, V. (2003). Effect of temperature on the volume and compressibilities of some amphiphilic penicillins in aqueous solution. Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics, 5, 1873–r1879.
  2. Panda, S. (2022). Analysis of Aqueous Dextran: An Ultrasonic Studies. Current Microwave Chemistry9(1), 30–36.
  3. Mayo Clinic. (2025, March 31). Cefotaxime (injection route). Mayo Foundation for Medical Education and Research.
  4. Shafran, N., Marroum, P. J., & Mitra, S. (2023). Cefotaxime. In StatPearls. StatPearls Publishing.
  5. U.S. National Library of Medicine. (2016, June 15). Cefotaxime injection: MedlinePlus drug information. MedlinePlus.
  6. Bartlett, J. G., & Gorbach, S. L. (1990). Cefotaxime and prophylaxis. The American Journal of Medicine, 88(4A), 47S–53S.
  7. Dudhe, C.M., & Patil, K.C. (2011). Study of molecular interactions of aqueous Vancomycin hydrochloride through ultrasonic investigation at 300K and 303K.
  8. Sharma, S.K., Nathan, V., Kumar, D., & Kishore, K. (2017). Molecular interaction studies of antibiotic drug Doxycycline Hyclate with aqueous mannitol using volumetric and acoustic methods. Journal of Molecular Liquids, 233, 147–156.
  9. Akilandeswari, P.E., Gayathri, B., Panneerselvam, M., & Govindarajan, P. (2016). Acoustical and quantum computational investigations on the stacking phenomenon of aqueous Norfloxacin antibiotic. Journal of Molecular Liquids, 222, 507–514.
  10. Shekaari, H., Abedi, R., Mokhtarpour, M., & Noorizadeh, H. (2024). Exploring interactions between antibiotics drugs and amino acids through volumetric and ultrasonic properties at different temperatures. Journal of Chemical & Engineering Data, 69(2), 675–686.
  11. Sharma, S. K., Nathan, V., Kumar, D., & Kishore, K. (2017). Molecular interaction studies of antibiotic drug Doxycycline Hyclate with aqueous mannitol using volumetric and acoustic methods. Journal of Molecular Liquids, 233, 147–156.
  12. Akilandeswari, P. E., Gayathri, B., Panneerselvam, M., & Govindarajan, P. (2016). Acoustical and quantum computational investigations on the stacking phenomenon of aqueous Norfloxacin antibiotic. Journal of Molecular Liquids, 222, 507–514.
  13. Lide, D. R. (Ed.). (2005). CRC Handbook of Chemistry and Physics (86th ed.). CRC Press.
  14. Kawamura, T., Kamei, A., & Yugawa, K. (2002). Solution density measuring method, sample cell used for the method, and solution density measuring device.
  15. Radford, N. T., & Waddle, R. J. (1995). Handheld density meter.
  16. Xie, H., Gao, M., Chen, L., Li, C., He, Z., Li, C., Wu, N., Li, J., Yang, M., Hu, Y., & Huang, W. (2020).
  17. Guo, Y., Yang, L., & Liu, L. (2013). Thermal field control method of thermostatic bath.
  18. Dhiman, N., Sharma, S., Kumar, B., Yadav, S., & Dubey, P. K. (2023). Development of sweep frequency ultrasonic interferometer for high precision velocity measurement in liquids. Review of Scientific Instruments94(11).
  19. Rao, K., & Rao, B. R. (1959). Study of Temperature Variation of Ultrasonic Velocities in Some Organic Liquids by Modified Fixed-Path Interferometer Method. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America31(4), 439–441.
  20. Borse, G. P., Deshp, U. G., Patil, S. R., & Hiray, A. R. (2012). Molecular interactions by ultrasonic velocity, viscosity and densitymeasurements in binary mixtures at 298.15 K3(6).
  21. Sharma, S., Sharma, S., Mishra, U. K., Mishra, U. K., Yadav, S., Yadav, S., Dubey, P. K., & Dubey, P. K. (2019). Improved ultrasonic interferometer technique for propagation velocity and attenuation measurement in liquids.
  22. Ali, A., Hyder, S., & Nain, A. K. (2005). Volumetric and viscometric study of molecular interactions in aqueous solutions of some drugs. Journal of Molecular Liquids, 121(1–3), 13–19.
  23. Choudhary, D., & Sharma, A. (2020). Investigation of structure-making and breaking behavior of drug molecules in aqueous media using ultrasonic and thermodynamic parameters. International Journal of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, 12(6), 63–67.
  24. Borah, B., & Saikia, J. (2024). Spectroscopic and Density Functional Theory Approach to Study the Interaction of Ibuprofen with Water Molecule. Journal of Scientific Research16(3), 647–661.
  25. Bernal, P J (1984). Apparent molal volumes, apparent molal compressibilities, and their isotope effects in aqueous and non-aqueous carbohydrate solutions.
  26. Bahadur, I.; Deenadayalu, N.: Apparent molar volume and apparent molar isentropic compressibility for the binary systems {methyltri-octylammoniumbis (trifluoromethylsulfonyl)imide+ethyl acetate or ethanol} at different temperatures under atmospheric pressure. Thermochimica Acta 566, 77–83 (2013)